عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
Islamic Republic of IRAN's nuclear activities have created various crises in both national and international fields for this country. Security Council increasing sanctions against Iran, and different threats against Iran's nuclear program, have created a complex situation for Iran. In the view of west the IRAN's nuclear continuation program and enrichment continuation is IRAN's attempt in context to achieve nuclear weapon. Thus west is trying to equipment international community to ward their demands. On the other hand IRAN insists on its nuclear rights (enrichment continuation) in order to providing growing energy needs and other issues. IRAN says this program is peaceful and says west trying is organized attempt for hindering IRAN from its international rights. Islamic republic of IRAN during its negotiations with Europe and 5+1 countries has achieved no clear consensus over its nuclear activities due to political space of bilateral negotiation. Maybe one of the reasons for this misunderstanding is lack of clear and transparent diplomacy and confidence- building in this field. This present study aims to specify west countries purposes in following nuclear negotiations with IRAN by using descriptive- analytical method. On this base we analyzed IRAN's nuclear conflict with west in the framework of game theories. And on this base we present negotiation methods and the diplomacy of confidence- building between parties.